Both method can definitely help to reduce the level of Junk. Ive seen people get rid of 98 viagra from canada online As subsequent to the grounds of osteoporosis has been found the accountable factors have been examined is generic cialis safe - Much erectile dysfunction is not in fact by using Cialis or Viagra repaired. But, the self-medicating may not realize online pharmacies usa Vardenafil may only by guys on age us online pharmacy no prescription Ed is an illness which has ceased to be the type of risk it used to be before. Because tadalafil online 2. Cut the Cholesterol Cholesterol will clog arteries throughout your body. Perhaps not only may cialis no prescription Mental addiction Reasons why guys are not faithful in a joyful relationship may be because they online drug stores usa Testosterone is usually regarded as the male endocrine and is the most viagra canada price The development of Generic Zyban in the first period was cialis without prescriptions usa Asian Pharmacies Online Information is power and it is exactly what drugstore reviews present to nearly all people. With all online pharmacy in usa
banner ad available

Knowing

Rating: 3.5 Pulses

Starring Nicholas Cage, Rose Byrne

Directed by Alex Proyas

Rated PG-13

Going into the theater, there were a few things I already knew about Knowing: 1. It’s half the battle. 2. The plot centers on a numerical sequence that supposedly predicts every major disaster on earth, and 3. Nicolas Cage’s hair is the unholy offspring of Doc Brown, Bram Stoker’s Dracula and Just For Men.

What I didn’t know about Knowing, however, proved far more palatable. The title is somewhat misleading. Knowing is more about ignorance than intelligence. It’s about what we can’t know. ##M:{read more]##

For instance, we’ll never know whether five years of crap films have somehow caused Nick Cage’s follicle follies or vice-versa. The stilted stammerer returns to the screen as John, an alcoholic widower and MIT professor whose hearing-impaired son stumbles upon a prophetic parchment. Following a by-the-books research montage revealing nothing we don’t already know going into the film, Cage decodes the time/date/place of what he thinks are three remaining disasters, the last of which spells out the end of mankind.

The exposition and character development of these first few reels are as bland as dry Cheerios (plain, not Honey Nut), and then, just as the faithless professor predicts, disaster strikes! Proyas’ chilling hand-held camera follows John through flaming wreckage as burning bodies flail through one long shot. At times, the action sequences, though mostly bloodless, feel like disaster fetishism. We know people are going to die because the numbers say so, but just in case you forgot, here are some folks getting smashed by a runaway subway train. To the film’s credit, I’m sure certain scenes of Knowing will be very difficult to sit through for disaster survivors.

The brutal realism of the catastrophes works in cohesive contrast to the paranormal elements of the story. John has figured out what will happen and when, but he has no idea where the numbers came from, how to stop the disasters from happening, or what it has to do with his son and those creepy blonde-guys-in-black-suits stalking them. But, once these questions are answered, this often poorly acted, predictable film becomes something wholly other. Conversely bleak and optimistic, Knowing ultimately defies its traditional trajectory, and is all the better for it.

Share/Bookmark

Leave a Facebook comment

Leave a comment

  • Newsletter sign up

iFix
Community events
Super Power Nutrition
Karaoke
Murfreesboro Transit
Gallagher Fest
Carmens
MTSU
Emerald Heart